Karnataka high court
-

Karnataka HC quashes 2018 ED notice for blocking Amnesty India’s bank account
Scroll Staff
-

Twitter has no right to speak on behalf of those whose accounts were blocked, Centre tells HC
Scroll Staff
-

Karnataka HC stays state government’s move to create new OBC categories for Lingayats and Vokkaligas
Scroll Staff
-

SC collegium reiterates name for appointment as Karnataka High Court judge for third time
Scroll Staff
-

‘Not at your beck and call’: Karnataka HC criticises Centre for seeking adjournments in Twitter case
Scroll Staff
-

‘Married daughter remains a daughter’: Karnataka HC quashes discriminatory defence welfare rule
Scroll Staff
-

‘Punitive action’: Karnataka HC sets aside order to block accounts of Congress, Bharat Jodo Yatra
Scroll Staff
-

Former Karnataka HC chief justice who upheld hijab ban appointed as law commission chief
Scroll Staff
-

Karnataka High Court asks Law Commission to rethink age of consent under POCSO Act
Scroll Staff
-

Government should give users reasons for blocking their accounts, Twitter tells Karnataka HC
Scroll Staff
-

Gauri Lankesh murder: Karnataka High Court rejects bail plea of person accused of plotting attack
Scroll Staff
-

Centre cannot issue general orders to block social media accounts, Twitter tells Karnataka HC
Scroll Staff
-

‘Is right to wear hijab too much to ask in a democracy?’: Top quotes from SC’s split verdict
Scroll Staff
-

On Karnataka hijab ban, Supreme Court delivers split verdict
Scroll Staff
-

Bengaluru civic polls: HC sets aside notification reserving wards for women, backward classes
Scroll Staff
-

More than half the tweets Centre wants to block are innocuous, Twitter tells Karnataka HC
Scroll Staff
-

Supreme Court stays corruption proceedings against BS Yediyurappa
Scroll Staff
-

Hijab ban: Karnataka HC should not have gone into question of essential religious practice, says SC
Scroll Staff
-

Hijab ban: Majority community trying to do away with Islamic practices, petitioner tells SC
Scroll Staff
-

Hijab ban is a question of individual rights, not essential religious practice, petitioners tell SC
Scroll Staff